The exorcism of Anthony of Lyon (1790-1871) and the demonic testimony about the Virgin Mary

The Demon’s Testimony and its Theological Significance
What makes António de Lyon’s case unique in Mariology are the declarations made by the demonic entity during the exorcisms. Under the authority of the exorcist, the demon was forced to confess truths about Mary that contradict his own nature and mission. This paradox, recognized as inverted or extorted testimony, has significant apologetic value: when the enemy of humanity is compelled to admit the greatness of the Virgin, such a confession cannot be attributed to subjective devotion or pious enthusiasm.The theology of exorcism teaches that, under the authority of Christ exercised by the exorcist, the demon can be compelled to tell the truth. The statements about Mary extracted in this context, relating to her power of intercession and her singular position in the economy of salvation, are a negative but authentic testimony. The demonic hatred towards Mary reveals, paradoxically, her greatness: the enemy does not hate what does not represent a threat.Biblical and Patristic Foundation
The hostility between Mary and the demon has biblical roots. The verse of Genesis 3:15, known as the Protoevangelium, proclaims: “I will put enmity between you and the woman, between your offspring and hers. She will crush your head and you will strike her heel.” The Church Fathers, from Justin Martyr and Saint Irenaeus of Lyon, interpreted this passage as a reference to the radical enmity between the Virgin Mary and the serpent, that is, the demon.In the context of the case of António de Lyon, this biblical enmity finds historical expression. The demon, forced to speak through the mouth of the exorcised, recognizes the woman who destroys his plans, confirming the tradition of documented historical exorcisms: Mary is consistently presented as the greatest obstacle to demonic action.Ecclesiastical Discernment and Reason in the Evaluation of Possessions
The case of António de Lyon also illustrates the Church’s methodological approach. By requiring prior medical and psychiatric examination, the Church demonstrates an epistemology that values both faith and reason, complementing rather than contradicting them. This protocol was followed in the case of António de Lyon and remains standard practice today.The rigorous evaluation of the observed phenomena before any declaration about demonic possession is a process of ecclesiastical discernment. When the Church recognizes a case such as that of António de Lyon, such recognition is the result of meticulous investigation. What the demon was forced to declare about Mary in this context is not accepted blindly but verified to ensure that there are no natural explanations.Mariological Legacy of Historical Exorcism Testimonies
The demonic testimonies about Mary, obtained in properly documented exorcism contexts such as the case of António de Lyon, represent a unique source for Mariology. Although they are not primary sources in the same sense as the Bible or patristic writings, they offer a peculiar type of evidence. These testimonies, by their very contradictory nature, illuminate Mariological doctrine through negation: what the demon hates in Mary is precisely what the Catholic faith affirms about her.The Marian devotion does not depend on this type of testimony to be founded, but in periods of doubt and theological relativism, the consistency of these accounts over the centuries, from the medieval times up to the 19th century with António de Lyon, serves as a sign of the living tradition that confirms Mary’s singular position in the history of salvation. For a deeper exploration of this theme, consult *Redemptoris Mater* by John Paul II (1987). The study of the relationship between Mary and the mystery of evil is part of the postgraduate program in Mariology at Locus Mariologicus.Graduate Studies in Mariology
Desire to deepen your formation in Mariology? Discover the Graduate Studies in Mariology from Locus Mariologicus, an academic formation that combines theological rigor, spiritual life, and the living tradition of the Church.
Responses