The intercession of Mary at the cross (1987): the demonic testimony, according to Father Giovanni Bamonte


I. Mary at the Cross: The Biblical Foundation for Intercession
The biblical foundation for Mary’s intercession is centered on two narrative moments from the Gospel of John: the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-11) and the Cross (John 19:25-27). At Cana, Mary’s intercession leads to Jesus’ first public manifestation of power, as He responds to the human need she anticipates and presents to Him, inaugurating the cycle of signs in the Gospel of John that reveal the identity of the Word.On the Cross, Mary’s silent presence at the foot of the Cross completes the arc: she was present at the beginning of the redemptive work and remained present at its fulfillment. Exegetical tradition, from Origen to Benedict XVI, has identified in this presence not only a sentimental fact but an active participation in the mystery being accomplished.Patristic theology developed this understanding, viewing Mary’s intercession as a structural dimension of the salvific economy. Irenaeus of Lyon, by formulating the antithesis between Eve and Mary, already implied that Mary’s obedience was not merely a single act but a lasting one: just as Eve continued to exercise her influence on humanity after the original sin, Mary continues to participate in redemption after Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross. The spiritual motherhood Christ bestowed upon her at the Cross does not cease with her physical death; it expands into her perpetual intercession for humanity, which He recapitulated in Himself.II. Co-offer at the Cross: Mary as a Participant in the Redemptive Sacrifice
Mariological dogma progressively developed the understanding of Mary’s presence at the Cross as a co-offer. The concept of Co-redemption, while still subject to theological debate regarding its definitive formulation, asserts that Mary was not a passive spectator on the Cross but an active participant in the logic of the sacrifice. The *Lumen Gentium*, in its dogmatic statement on the role of the Virgin Mary, emphasizes this point, affirming that Mary, by her obedience, became a partaker in Christ’s sacrifice, sharing in His redemptive work.In the text, number 58 states that Mary “suffered deeply with her only-begotten Son and united herself with a maternal heart to Christ’s sacrifice.” The language is precise: union with the sacrifice implies a participation that, without confusing itself with Christ’s unique and unrepeatable mediation, is theologically significant.
The documented exorcism records by Bamonte confirm this dimension through a radically unexpected avenue. In response to a prayer invoking the redeeming power of the Cross, the demonic entity, constrained to answer, stated about Mary: “what she offered and, under her Cross, she suffered.” The confession, wrenched from the adversary, identifies Mary’s presence at the foot of the Cross as an act of offering that he recognizes as theologically decisive.
Mary’s suffering at the Cross is not merely the natural pain of a mother who sees her son die: it is, according to this involuntary confession, an oblation that the enemy of humanity recorded as his defeat. Father Bamonte recorded the demonic reaction to words that recalled this co-offering: “enough, don’t make me remember, that’s enough, it’s burning me.”
III. The Immaculate Heart as the Instrument of Universal Intercession
The post-17th-century Marian tradition developed devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary as an expression of her intercession in its affective and volitive dimensions. The heart, in biblical anthropology, designates the center of a person, the place where intentions are formed and decisions are made. Mary’s Immaculate Heart, within this framework, is the symbol of her entire person oriented towards God and humanity: her will, her love, her suffering, and her joy, all gathered in a permanent oblation that forms the foundation of her intercessory activity.
The demonic testimonies documented by Bamonte notably converge on this point. In one of the most cited sessions, the demonic entity, constrained by the authority of the exorcism, stated: “the Immaculate Heart of Mary will save the whole world. Only her Immaculate Heart.” This declaration has a theological depth that its context of origin does not allow to be underestimated. The adversary of humanity, forced to speak about Mary, identifies the instrument of universal salvation not in an abstract doctrine but in a concrete personal reality: the Heart that the Church has defined as Immaculate. The demonic proclamation, in a register of hatred and constraint, echoes, in a profound way, what Fátima and the Marian magisterium of the 20th century affirmed in the register of revelation and faith.
Responses